Liberal Democracy and Socialism
LIBERAL DEMOCRACY AND SOCIALISM
Liberal democracy is basically the same things as anarchism, my conception of anarchism anyway. My conception of anarchism is based upon the idea of equality of economic developments, equality of economic developments for all traditions, and\or equality of economic developments for independent traditions. We should have also the idea of liberal democracy and socialism, the political concept of socialism should also value the idea of liberal democracy, and also as anarchism which is basically the same things as liberal democracy is generally perceived also to be a socialist doctrine. It is stated therefore that the political concept of socialism should value and embrace the political concept of liberal democracy, and in so doing negate phoney deceitful socialist ideology, such as marxism, which tried to condition socialist thinking against the idea of democracy. The true nature of the political concept of anarchism can be analysed to be basically the same thing as the true nature of the political concept of socialism as is explained below.
The idea of equality of economic developments can be firstly elucidated in relation to housing. We all need a place to live, an abode – a house, apartment, cottage, bungalow etc. As we all need an abode, a home, to be equally economically self-sufficient, equally economically self-empowered we should all own our own homes, our own abodes. Equality of economic developments in that sense, in relation to the self-ownership of housing, can be also thought of as the anarchist idea of a society where all are their own masters. People become their own masters in that sense, they become economically self-sufficient, economically self-empowered when they come to own their own homes. As such it can be said, that such anarchism evolves from capitalism. As all over the world, the economic means to provide housing for people is controlled by the political concept of capitalism, the banks and capitalist property developers, then it is such capitalism that provides housing for people, but it can also be said that the idea of anarchism evolves, derives from such capitalism, for people become their own economic masters when their mortgages are paid off and they come to own their own homes. It is desirable that all people should own their own homes and become economically self-empowered in that way, and therefore we have the idea of equality of economic developments in relation to housing.
We also have the theory of equality of economic developments in a broader political sense in relation to traditions. In accordance with liberal democratic thinking, and in accordance with my conception of anarchism, various traditions, all traditions should flourish, and in so flourishing, to be economically self-empowered as distinct traditions should have their own quota of economic developments, and therefore we have the idea of equality of economic developments for all traditions. Therefore, this theory of equality of economic developments for all traditions, which is only a theory with regard to the political concepts of anarchism and socialism, as the political concepts of anarchism and socialism don’t have control of economic power, states that various traditions should own their own economic developments such as houses, hotels, shops, restaurants, schools, universities etc.
An anarchism can also be derived from the internet. On the internet people can create their own web-sites, and in creating their own web-sites individuals have a sense of self-achievement, of self-empowerment. Anarchism therefore can be deduced to derive from the internet in that individuals become their own masters in that sense when they create their own web-sites. Therefore, we can recognise that the political concept of anarchism can derive something from capitalism. As both housing and the internet are creations of capitalism, it is true that people become their own masters, become self-empowered when they come to own their own homes and when they create their own websites.
Anarchism can be thought of as being basically the same thing as liberal democracy. The idea of liberal democracy is that all people, including different traditions and individuals should be free and flourish in democratic conditions. The conception of socialist anarchism says that this also has to be economic, that individuals and traditions should flourish by being equally economically empowered, by the idea of equality of equality of economic developments. And in Chapter 6 ”Equality Of Economic Developments For All Traditions” in the section “The Anarchist Idea of Power Distribution” I say that power should be distributed among individuals as well as traditions. An individual doesn’t necessarily have to be part of a tradition, doesn’t necessarily have to regard himself or herself as being part of a tradition, and surely it enhances the idea of democracy if there are also individuals who are free and empowered as well as various traditions being empowered. As the political concept of liberal democracy emphasises the idea of the individual, this also concurs with my anarchist idea of power distribution.
While the political concept of anarchism therefore can derive something from capitalism, we should, as socialists, have thoughtfulness for people who were told they were communists. I don’t accept that there should be such a political concept as communism. I don’t think people should be called communists, it’s a dehumanising concept. And therefore I refer to such people as people who were told they were communists either by the deceitful ideology of marxism and\or by a marxist state, and as a socialist I think that such people should be set free.
Nobody should be called a communist, nobody really wants to be called a communist, it’s a dehumanising concept. It’s dehumanising because the idea of communism would be oppressive and one-dimensional. And it’s dehumanising because it’s based upon a political deceit, the ideological deceit of marxism which was invented by God. Such people who were told they were ‘communists’ by the ideological deceit of marxism and\or by a marxist state, should be, need to be set free. Wouldn’t it be good, wouldn’t it be an inspiration, to realise such a person or persons are being set free, by giving them the inspiration to be liberal democrats, by giving them the inspiration to believe that they value the values of liberal democracy, human rights, democratic rights, that all traditions should flourish, that capitalism should be. For phoney socialist ideology is deceitful anyway, for capitalism is God’s capitalism, it was invented by God and it’s what God wants.
Such people should be set free by being told that socialism can have a moral democratic perspective, and that the political concept of socialism embraces and values the idea of liberal democracy, and therefore people who were told they were communists, if they want to be socialists, upon having political ideology clarified for them and the true nature of political reality revealed to them, can also value and believe in liberal democracy. And wouldn’t it be good to set such a person or persons free, a person or persons who were told they communists, who were deceived by God, and to see that such a person has been set free from phoney socialism, from the ideological deceit of marxism which was invented by God, so that such a person has the inspiration to be a liberal democrat, and if such a person, having had political ideology clarified , having had the true nature of political reality revealed, wants to be a socialist, that such a person is a socialist as a liberal democratic, that such a person is a socialist and a liberal democratic, that such a person is a democratic socialist in being a socialist and a liberal democrat.
And let it be said that it is I who wants to convey this idea to such a person, and not God, and not phoney socialist parties. They never said they wanted to convey this idea to such a person.
For, as I have said in my book “True Nature of the Political Concept of Socialism Revealed”, it is rare to find expressions of inspiration, of morality, of moral inspiration, in so-called socialist ideology. I found a few, and therefore as I, as a socialist, am inspired to find such expressions of moral inspiration, it is my wish to want to convey this morality with other socialists, with people who were told they were communists for example, to want to share this inspiration of socialist morality with them, so that they have the inspiration to be liberal democrats and socialists. And we should have the idea of socialism and liberal democracy.
As I have said above liberal democracy is basically the same things as anarchism, and as anarchism is generally regarded as being a socialist doctrine, and in realisation of the true nature of political reality, then the true nature of the political concept of anarchism is basically the same thing as the true nature of the political concept of socialism.
The true nature of the political concept of socialism is revealed by revealing the true nature of political reality.
The true nature of political reality is that God exists, that there is only one God, that the power of God exists, that as the power exists and as God created human beings it is inevitable that God must desire to share his power with human beings, that God has done this, that God has shared his power with his friends, that God has come to live in the world to share his power with his friends, that God’s chosen friends are the state and capitalism, that God therefore is a capitalist-royalist, that God is the power and intelligence behind the means of production. This is the true nature of political reality.
The true nature of the political concept of socialism therefore is revealed by revealing this true nature of political reality. The true nature of the political concept of socialism is that, as the original socialist objects to all war, and as the political concept of socialism has to do with the desire for control of the means of production, and as the true nature of political reality is that the means of production are controlled by God, the state and capitalism, socialism is a democratic socialism, a socialism that values liberal democracy, and seeks for some control of economic power, of the means of production by peaceful means.
As this is the true nature of the political concept of socialism, and as the true nature of the political concept of socialism has not yet achieved economic power, as the true nature of political reality is that economic power is controlled by God, the state and capitalism, if the true nature of the political concept of socialism was to achieve economic power, it could only be a minority concept, a minority achievement.
But true socialists can become satisfied that socialism would only be a minority concept, if socialism were to achieve power, because you can come to the view, to the belief that it is good to be in the minority.
Global Referendum – Please Vote Now
